Presupposition and Implicature in Model-Theoretic Pragmatics

نویسنده

  • Douglas B. Moran
چکیده

106 one c a n m e c h a n i c a l l y b u i l d r e c o g n i z e r s and r a n d o ~ g e n e r a t o r s . But s u c h m a c h i n e s a r e n o t t h e g r a ~ a r s , and a r e c o g n i z e r i s m a n i f e s t l y n o t t h e same m a c h i n e a s a g e n e r a t o r , even t h o u g h t h e same g rammar may u n d e r l i e both. S u p p o s e v e r e p h r a s e t h e q u e s t i o n a s ' ~ h y do we h a v e s e p a r a t e k n o w l e d g e s t r u c t u r e s f o r i n t e r p r e t a t i o n and p r o d u c t i o n ? " T h i s p r e s u p p o s e s t h a t t h e r e a r e s e p a r a t e k n o w l e d g e s t r u c t u r e s , and i n o u r c u r r e n t systems t h i s i s o n l y p a r t i a l l y t r u e . I n t e r p r e t i n g a n d p r o d u c t i o n p r o g r a m s a b o u n d in ad h o c p r o c e d u r e s t h a t s h a r e v e r y l i t t l e i n common n e a r t h e l a n g u a g e e n d . The i n t e r p r e t e r s a r e f u l l o f m e t h o d s f o r guessing a t m e a n i n g s , filling in t h e b l a n k s , p r e d i c t i n g l i k e l y f o l l o w u p s , a n d so o n . The g e n e r a t o r s a r e f u l l o f m e t h o d s f o r e l i m i n a t i n g c o n t e x t u a l i t ems , p i c k i n g a p p r o p r i a t e d e s c r i p t o r s , c h o o s i n g p r o n o u n s , and so o n . Each h a s a v e r y d i f f e r e n t s e t o f p r o b l e m s t o d e a l w i t h . On t h e o t h e r h a n d , o u r i n t e r p r e t e r s and g e n e r a t o r s do s h a r e wha t we t h i n k i s t h e i m p o r t a n t s t u f f , t h e w o r l d k n o w l e d g e , w i t h o u t w h i c h a l l t h e o t h e r p r o c e s s i n g w o u l d n ' t be w o r t h a p a r t r i d g e i n a p a r s e t r e e . The w o r l d k n o w l e d g e s a y s w h a t m a k e s s e n s e i n o n d e r s t a n d i n s and wha t i s i m p o r t a n t t o t a l k a b o u t . P a r t o f t h e s e p a r a t i o n o f i n t e r p r e t a t i o n a n d g e n e r a t i o n o c c u r s when t h e p r o g r a m s f o r e a c h a r e d e v e l o p e d by d i f f e r e n t p e o p l e . T h i s T e s u l t s i n u n r e a l i s t i c s y s t e m s t h a t w r i t e w h a t t h e y c a n ' t r e a d a n d r e a d wha t t h e y c a n ' t w r i t e . Someday w e ' l l h a v e a good mode l o f how k n o w l e d g e t h e i n t e r p r e t e r g a i n s a b o u t u n d e r s t a n d i n g a new word i s c o n v e r t e d t o k n o w l e d g e t h e g e n e r a t o r c a n u s e t o v a l i d l y p i c k t h a t word i n p r o d u c t i o n . T h i s v i i i h a v e a c c o u n t f o r how we c a n i n t e r p r e t w o r d s w i t h o u t b e i n g r e a d y t o u s e t h e m . F o r e x a m p l e , f r o m a s e n t e n c e l i k e "The c a r s w e r v e d o f f t h e r o a d a n d s t r u c k a b r i d g e a b u t m e n t , " we c a n i n f e r t h a t an a b u t m e n t i s a n o u n d e s c r i b i n g some k i n d o f o u t d o o r p h y s i c a l o b j e c t , a t t a c h a b l e t o a b r i d g e . T h i s w o u l d be e n o u g h f o r i n t e r p r e t a t i o n , b u t o b v i o u s l y t h e g e n e r a t o r w i l l n e e d co know more a b o u t wha t an a b u t m e n t i s b e f o r e i t c o u l d c o n f i d e n t l y s a y " O h , l o o k a t t h e c u t e abutment!" A f i n a l p o i n t on s h a r i n g . T h e r e a r e two s t a n d a r d a r g u m e n t s f o r s h a r i n g a t l e a s t g r = m m a t i c a l i n f o r m a t i o n . One i s t o s a v e s p a c e , a n d t h e o t h e r i s t o m a i n t a i n c o n s i s t e n c y . W i t h o u t c l a i m i n g t h a t s h a r i n g d o e s n ' t o c c u r , I w o u l d l i k e t o p o i n t o u t t h a t b o t h a r g u m e n t s a r e v e r y w e a k . F i r s t , t h e r e i s r e a l l y n o t a l o t o f g r a m m a t i c a l k n o w l e d g e , c o m p a r e d a g a i n s t a l l t h e o t h e r k n o w l e d g e we h a v e a b o u t t h e w o r l d , so n o t t h a t much s p a c e w o u l d be s a v e d i f s h a r i n g o c c u r r e d . S e c o n d , i f t h e g e n e r a t o r d e r i v e s i t ' s l i n g u i s t i c k n o w l e d g e f r o m t h e p a r s e r ' s d a t a b a s e , t h e n w e ' l l h a v e a s much c o n s i s t e n c y a s we c o u l d m e a s u r e i n p e o p l e a n y w a y .

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

The Complementary Relation between Pragmatics and Systemic-Functional Grammar

Pragmatics and Systemic -functional Grammar (SFG) used to ignore each other and lack in communication, however, in certain aspects they are indeed in a position to complement each other. This paper mainly discusses on one hand the bases for the complementary relation between pragmatics and systemic -functional grammar (CR-P&SFG), on the other hand the main aspects concerning the CR-P&SFG. Pragm...

متن کامل

Three Processes in Natural Language Interpretation

To address complications involving ambiguity, presupposition and implicature, three processes underlying natural language interpretation are isolated: translation, entailment and attunement. A meta-language integrating these processes is outlined, elaborating on a proof-theoretic approach to presupposition. §

متن کامل

Presupposition as a Pragmatic Inference toward a New Conceptualization of the Term

The paper glosses the pragmatic inference of presupposition in a way different from what has been mentioned elsewhere in the previous researches. All researches conducted on this inference viewed it as an internally linguistic system. To have figured it that way, the writer of This paper thinks that is the main reason which made a linguist like Levinson(1983) to consider it as partially underst...

متن کامل

Information, Relevance, and Social Decisionmaking: Some Principles and Results of Decision-Theoretic Semantics

I propose to treat natural language semantics as a branch of pragmatics, identified in the way of C.S. Peirce, F.P. Ramsey, and R. Carnap as decision-theory. The notion of relevance plays a key role. It is explicated traditionally, distinguished from a recent homophone, and applied in its natural framework of issue-based communication. Empirical emphasis is on implicature and presupposition. Se...

متن کامل

Optimality Theoretic Pragmatics and the Explicature/Implicature Distinction

Optimality Theoretic Pragmatics is a (partly) formalized theory that conforms to a dynamic neo-Gricean approach. It assumes one phase of the updating process that involves the application of the so-called Qand I/Rprinciples. Critics of the theory have maintained that such an approach does not discriminate between processes where apparent conversational implicatures enter into propositional cont...

متن کامل

Updating Discourse Context with Active Logic

In this paper we present our implementation of a system of active logic that processes natural language discourses. We focus on problems that involve presupposition and the associated well{known problems of the projection of presupposition. We discuss Heim's largely successful theory of presupposition and point out certain limitations. We then use these observations to build our discourse proce...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

عنوان ژورنال:

دوره   شماره 

صفحات  -

تاریخ انتشار 1981